• Digizenburg Dispatch
  • Posts
  • Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering - Mixing Agile Requirements With Prompt Engineering

Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering - Mixing Agile Requirements With Prompt Engineering

Hey there, Digizens!

Get ready to level up your AI game! Over on our YouTube channel, we've kicked off an 11-part Shorts series all about Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering. If you've ever felt like your AI prompts are a bit of a gamble, or you're not quite getting the amazing results you know are possible, then this one's for you.

We're already 4 episodes in, with a new short dropping daily for the next week! But we know that sometimes you want to sit down and really dig into the details, maybe with a good cup of coffee (or tea, we don't judge!). So, we've put together this Technical Edition of the Dispatch to give you a more comprehensive article version of the entire YouTube series. It’s your one-stop-shop to understanding how mixing a bit of Agile thinking with your AI prompting can make a world of difference.

We're talking about moving from guesswork to a structured, reliable way to talk to Large Language Models (LLMs) and get them to deliver exactly what you need. So, whether you're following along with the Shorts daily or want to get the full picture right here, we've got you covered.

Ready to transform your AI interactions? You can catch the full Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering YouTube Shorts Series here and then dive into the details below!

Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering

Beyond Basic Prompts: Why Your AI Needs Agile Thinking

Ever feel like your AI prompts are a bit like rolling the dice? Sometimes you hit the jackpot, other times... not so much. You're definitely not alone in that boat! But what if there was a more structured, reliable way to get the results you actually want from those incredible Large Language Models?

What is Prompt Engineering?

First off, what even is Prompt Engineering? Think of it as the art and science of strategically designing those task-specific instructions – your prompts – to guide what an AI model outputs. The cool part? You're doing this without having to go in and change the underlying model itself. It’s all about crafting the perfect request.

Common Frustrations

But let's be real, it often comes with some common frustrations:

  • There's often a heavy dependency on your own intuition, which can lead to a whole lot of laborious trial-and-error.

  • You might have noticed that LLMs can be super sensitive to even tiny changes in how you phrase things or structure your prompt.

  • And because of that, it can be tough to get consistent, high-quality results, especially when you're trying to get the AI to do something complex.

The Big Idea: Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering

So, here’s a thought: What if we took proven principles from the world of Agile methodologies and used them to transform prompt engineering? We could move it from an intuitive craft into something more disciplined, user-centric, and, crucially, measurable.

That’s the core idea behind Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering: making your prompts truly user-focused, driven by the value you want to create, and measurable so you know they're working.

Before we dive deeper, are you making a critical mistake with your prompts? Next, we’ll reveal the number one Golden Rule for any good AI prompt!

The #1 Rule for AI Prompts: Crystal-Clear Instructions!

Want to unlock your AI's full potential? It all starts with The Golden Rule of Prompting: Clarity and Specificity. Get this right, and you're halfway there!

Your AI is incredibly capable, but it’s not a mind reader. Vague or poorly defined instructions are a primary cause of irrelevant or incorrect LLM responses. Without clarity, the LLM is essentially left to guess what you intend.

How to Ensure Clarity

Be as detailed and specific as possible. Clearly articulate the desired:

  • Context: What's the background?

  • Outcome: What should the final result be?

  • Length: A sentence? A paragraph?

  • Format: Plain text? Bullet points? JSON?

  • Style or Tone: Formal? Friendly? Humorous?

For instance, instead of "Write about dogs," which is too vague, try: "Write a 50-word playful description of a golden retriever puppy, suitable for a children's story." This gives the AI a much better target.

While detail is key, conciseness also matters. Avoid unnecessary "fluffy" language that can dilute instructions. Find the sweet spot: enough detail for clarity, but direct enough so the core message isn’t lost.

Clarity is king, but there's more! Next, we’ll cover three more quick tips: keeping it short, giving context, and defining your output.

Prompting Power-Ups: Conciseness, Context & Clear Output Specs

Last time, we established that Clarity is the Golden Rule. Now, let's add three more power-ups to your prompting toolkit!

Principle 2: Conciseness and Brevity – Keep it Lean!

While specificity is crucial, prompts should also be concise. Avoid unnecessary "fluffy" language that can dilute your core instructions or confuse the LLM. Be direct and to the point.

Principle 3: Effective Context Provision – Ground Your AI!

LLMs perform significantly better with relevant background information, keywords, or data. This context helps the model understand the specific domain or nuances of your request. Don't make your AI guess the bigger picture.

Principle 4: Specifying Output Constraints – Tell it Exactly What You Want!

Get granular about the AI's response. Explicitly state requirements for:

  • Length: How long should the output be?

  • Format: JSON, bullet points, a table?

  • Style: Formal, academic, casual, conversational?

  • Tone: Professional, empathetic, humorous?

Pro-tip: providing examples of your desired output format can be particularly effective, especially for structured data.

Combine these power-ups with clarity, and you'll dramatically improve your prompts. Next, let's bring in the 'user' formally with Agile 'User Stories' to focus on the WHY.

User Stories for Prompt Engineering: Define Your Prompt's "Why"

Want your AI to really understand what you need? It's not just about what you ask, but also who the output is for and why it's important! Let's discover "User Stories" for prompts.

What's an Agile User Story?

In Agile development, a User Story is an informal explanation of a software feature from the end user's perspective. Its purpose is to articulate how work will deliver value. The standard structure is:

"As a <Role/Persona>, I want to <Goal/Action>, So That <Benefit/Value>."

Adapting for Prompts – "Prompt User Stories"

  1. "As a <Role/Persona>": Who is the LLM's output for, or what persona should the LLM adopt?

    • Example: "As a marketing manager..."

  2. "I want <Goal/Action for the LLM>": What specific task or content should the LLM generate?

    • Example: "...I want a list of five engaging blog post titles..."

  3. "So That<Benefit/Value>": What's the intended impact or value for the Role?

    • Example: "...so that I can quickly brainstorm content and increase reader engagement."

Why This Matters

Using Prompt User Stories anchors your prompt to genuine user needs and value propositions. It shifts the focus from just getting an output to getting the right output that serves a real purpose.

You've defined the "Why." Next: How do you know if the AI actually delivered? We're talking "Given-When-Then" for defining success!

Know It's Right: "Given-When-Then" for Your AI Prompts

Tired of AI outputs that almost hit the mark? You've crafted your "Prompt User Story," so you know the "who, what, and why." Now, let's define exactly what success looks like using Acceptance Criteria (AC) and the Given-When-Then (GWT) format!

What are Acceptance Criteria (AC)?

ACs are predefined, testable conditions your prompt's output must satisfy to be considered complete. They are pass/fail statements, clarify scope, and ensure a common understanding of "done."

The Given-When-Then (GWT) Format

This structure provides a clear, scenario-based way to define behavior:

  1. Given (Context/Precondition): Describes the initial context before the action.

    • Example: "Given the Q3 financial report for Company Z..."

  2. When (Action): Describes the specific action performed or event that occurs.

    • Example: "When the LLM processes the prompt..."

  3. Then (Observable Consequence): Describes the expected outcome.

    • Example: "Then the output is a JSON object containing..."

Why GWT for Prompts?

GWT brings clarity and makes your desired output characteristics testable. No more vague feelings about whether the AI "got it right."

GWT is great, but for Generative AI, we can make it even more robust. How do we explicitly tie these criteria to the value in our User Story and define how we'll measure success? That's next, as we extend GWT.

Linking Prompts to Value: The "So That" in GWT-ST-AMB

We've seen how "Given-When-Then" (GWT) defines expected behavior. But did it deliver value? Ensure every part of your prompt's output matters with the crucial "So That" (ST) link, moving towards a GWT-ST-AMB structure!

Our Prompt User Story has that vital "So That <Benefit/Value>" clause. The "So That" we're adding to our GWT acceptance criteria directly connects back to this.

The "So That" (ST) in GWT-ST-AMB

By including the "So That" clause from the Prompt User Story within each GWT-ST-AMB acceptance criterion, you ensure that each testable condition (the "Then") actively supports the intended user benefit ("So That").

Example:

  • Given: The Q3 financial report...

  • When: The LLM processes the prompt...

  • Then: The output is a JSON object...

  • So That: ...the analyst can easily parse the anomalies for their presentation...

This "So That" acts as a constant check: does this specific output characteristic contribute to the larger purpose?

Why It's Powerful

It ensures every testable condition validates the intended user benefit or business value. You're checking if the AI did the right thing that contributes to the overall goal.

We've linked output to value! Next: How do we prove it? The game-changing "As Measured By" makes AI accountable.

Making AI Accountable: The "As Measured By" in GWT-ST-AMB

How do we stop subjective debates about AI quality? Make your prompt's success undeniable with the "As Measured By" (AMB) component of GWT-ST-AMB! This is the key to objective proof.

The "As Measured By" (AMB) Component

Critical for operationalizing testability, AMB details how the "Then" condition (and the "So That" benefit) will be objectively tested, verified, and measured. It must define specific metrics, checks, or observable evidence.

Examples of AMB Metrics for LLM Outputs:

  • Deterministic Metrics: For structured/factual outputs.

    • Examples: Accuracy, F1 score, ROUGE/BLEU scores (with caveats), schema validation for JSON.

  • Non-Deterministic/Qualitative (but structured) Metrics: For nuanced/creative outputs.

    • Examples: Human evaluation on Likert scales (relevance, coherence), LLM-as-a-judge against rubrics.

  • Task-Specific Metrics: Custom checks.

    • Examples: Readability scores, sentiment analysis scores, keyword presence.

The Impact

"As Measured By" transforms output validation from a vague assessment into a rigorous, objective process against predefined success metrics tied to value.

The theory is solid! Ready to see GWT-ST-AMB in a real example? Next, we'll build Part 1 of an Agile Prompt for a customer service scenario.

Agile Prompts in Action - Example Part 1: User Story & Setting the Scene (GWT-ST)

Let's get practical! We're building an Agile AI prompt for a customer service interaction summarizer. First, the Prompt User Story.

Example Scenario: Customer Service Interaction Summarizer

1. Crafting the Prompt User Story: "As a customer support manager, I want concise summaries of customer service chat transcripts, highlighting the customer's issue, steps taken by the agent, and resolution status, so that I can quickly assess agent performance and identify recurring customer pain points without reading entire transcripts."

This defines the Role, LLM Goal/Action, and Benefit/Value.

2. Defining an Acceptance Criterion (AC-SUM-01: Content Accuracy & Completeness) - GWT-ST Focus:

  • Given: A customer service chat transcript (plain text, 200-2000 words) and LLM persona "Professional Summarizer."

  • When: The LLM processes the prompt to summarize the transcript.

  • Then: The output is a structured summary accurately capturing the primary issue(s), all distinct agent actions, and final resolution status; summary is neutral and 100-150 words.

  • So That: I can quickly and accurately assess agent performance... and identify recurring customer pain points for process improvement.

We've set the stage and linked to value! Next, in Part 2, we'll define how to measure this and draft the first prompt.

Agile Prompts in Action - Example Part 2: Measuring Success (AMB) & First Draft

Welcome to Part 2 of our summarizer example! We have a User Story and GWT-ST for content accuracy. Now, how do we prove the AI nailed it? Let's define the "As Measured By" (AMB) and draft an initial prompt.

Defining "As Measured By" (AMB) for AC-SUM-01:

  • Structure Check: Output contains distinct sections for "Customer Issue," "Agent Actions," "Resolution Status" (manual check or regex).

  • Factual Accuracy: Human evaluation (Likert 1-5) confirms factual accuracy >= 4.0.

  • Length Check: Automated word count is 100-150 words.

  • Tone Check: Sentiment analysis confirms neutrality (e.g., score between -0.2 and +0.2).

  • (Optional): LLM-as-judge for coherence >= 0.85.

Initial Prompt Design Snippet:

  • System Message: "You are a Professional Summarizer AI..."

  • User Message: "Summarize the following chat. Identify: primary issue, key agent actions, final resolution. Summary: neutral, 100-150 words. Output: JSON with keys 'customer_issue', 'agent_actions', 'resolution_status'. Transcript: ."

The Idea of Iterative Refinement

Our first draft is rarely perfect. We Execute this prompt, then Evaluate against our AMB conditions. If "Agent Actions" are too brief, we Refine the prompt (e.g., add "Be specific") and test again. This Craft -> Execute -> Evaluate -> Refine loop is key.

How do you keep all this organized? Next, the "Prompt Design Canvas" – your Agile prompting sidekick!

Your Agile Prompting Toolkit: The Prompt Design Canvas

Feeling like an Agile Prompting pro but need to keep it all organized? Introducing the Prompt Design Canvas – your blueprint for consistently awesome prompts!

What is the Prompt Design Canvas?

A structured template to systematically apply Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering. It guides your thinking, ensures all critical aspects are considered, and serves as a standardized record.

Key Components:

  1. Prompt User Story: Keeps it user-centric and value-driven.

  2. GWT-ST-AMB Acceptance Criteria: Forms the basis for rigorous testing and validation.

  3. Target LLM(s) & Version: Acknowledges model-specific performance.

  4. Core Prompt Instructions: The actual prompt text.

  5. Selected Prompting Technique(s): Documents your engineering approach.

  6. Iteration Log & Learnings: Tracks evolution and captures knowledge.

  7. (Optional) Ethical Considerations & Bias Mitigation.

Benefits:

Promotes discipline, clarity, user-focus, testability, value-driven design, easier peer review, and knowledge sharing.

You've got the principles, process, and toolkit! In our final section, we'll recap the Agile Prompt Engineering journey.

Agile Prompt Engineering: Series Recap & Your Next Steps!

You've made it! Let's quickly recap your new superpowers for mastering AI conversations.

The Agile-Infused Prompt Engineering Journey:

  1. Anchor in Value with a "Prompt User Story": "As a..., I want..., So That..." keeps efforts user-centric.

  2. Define Success with "GWT-ST-AMB Acceptance Criteria": Given, When, Then, So That, As Measured By brings clarity and objective evaluation.

  3. Embrace Iterative Refinement: Craft -> Execute -> Evaluate (against AMB!) -> Refine. Document learnings.

  4. Utilize the "Prompt Design Canvas": Structures your work and documentation.

The Big Wins:

This framework leads to more user-centric, value-driven, measurable, and reliable LLM interactions, moving prompt engineering towards a disciplined practice.

The Future:

Prompt engineering is evolving rapidly. Structured approaches like this help manage that growth, ensuring effective and responsible AI interaction.

This is just the beginning. The principles learned will serve you well in the exciting world of generative AI.

Whew, that was a lot, but hopefully, you're feeling energized and ready to put these Agile prompt engineering principles into practice! This framework isn't about rigid rules, but about providing a structured way of thinking that can lead to some truly amazing results from your AI interactions.

Remember, the goal here at the Digizenburg Dispatch is to help our whole Central PA community get comfortable and confident with new technology. This is just one piece of that puzzle!

As promised, the first four shorts of our 11-part series are already live for you to check out, or to share with friends and colleagues who might be interested:

Keep an eye on our YouTube channel for the rest of the series dropping daily!

We'd love to hear your thoughts on this! What was your biggest takeaway? Are you excited to try crafting a Prompt User Story or some GWT-ST-AMB criteria? Head over to our Facebook, Instagram, or LinkedIn pages and let us know in the comments. Let's get a conversation started!

And, if you haven't already, make sure you're subscribed to the Digizenburg Dispatch newsletter so you don't miss out on more deep dives into the tech that's shaping our world.

Until next time, happy prompting!

Social Media

Digizenburg Dispatch Community Spaces

Hey Digizens, your insights are what fuel our community! We've been diving deep into the world where AI meets BI, and we know many of you have firsthand experiences and brilliant perspectives to share. Let's keep the conversation flowing beyond these pages, on the platforms that work best for you. We'd love for you to join us in social media groups on Facebook, LinkedIn, and Reddit – choose the space where you already connect or feel most comfortable. Share your thoughts, ask questions, spark discussions, and connect with fellow Digizens who are just as passionate about navigating and shaping our digital future. Your contributions enrich our collective understanding, so jump in and let your voice be heard on the platform of your choice!

Reddit - Central PA

Digizenburg Events

Date

Event

Thursday, June 55:00 – 6:00pm

York -Merge York

Friday, June 6⋅8:30 – 9:30am

Lancaster Tech Open Coffee Club

Thursday, June 12⋅6:00 – 8:00pm

Pub Standards Lancaster

How did you like today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate in polls.

Our exclusive Google Calendar is the ultimate roadmap for all the can’t-miss events in Central PA! Tailored specifically for the technology and digital professionals among our subscribers, this curated calendar is your gateway to staying connected, informed, and inspired. From dynamic tech meetups and industry conferences to cutting-edge webinars and innovation workshops, our calendar ensures you never miss out on opportunities to network, learn, and grow. Join the Dispatch community and unlock your all-access pass to the digital pulse of Central PA.

Subscribe to keep reading

This content is free, but you must be subscribed to Digizenburg Dispatch to continue reading.

Already a subscriber?Sign in.Not now